Hinkley: What changed (nothing) and what happens next
Even though the UK government has given the go ahead for Hinkley Point C, there are still a lot of obstacles in the way.
Now to give you some sort of anecdotal evidence as to how unpopular this nuclear project is, everyone (literally) that I have spoken to, even those that are sceptical about climate change and all the rest, everyone thinks the plan to build Hinkley Point C is barking mad.
http://energydesk.greenpeace.org/2016/09/15/hinkley-happens-next/
Better than fracking… still not great.
Hinckley point is private property Law can explain
She +David Major you are shit loading your ignorance. Your brain is in your your butt, and you shouldn’t speak of something that you are not knowledgeable about. You need to get educated. Darkness is shading your light. Renewable energy is the way to go. Sunshine states like Arizona, should produce lots of solar energy.
George Boothe There is very little empirical evidence to support the pro solar power nonsense. http://thebulletin.org/myth-renewable-energy
David Major there is very little empirical evidence for what claim exactly?
The objections to Hickley C are manifold and are not even primarily environmental concerns. The main objections are to do with economics, politics and safety.
Felix Watts Well among many other false assertions from the “environmentalists” the claim that solar energy is more “environmentally friendly” and somehow “renewable.” This link does a great job of discussing the “renewable” aspect:
http://thebulletin.org/myth-renewable-energy
The only truly renewable energy is a breeder reactor.
Carl Page what is your definition of truly renewable?