Let me think.. October 2014.. January 2015.. really? Well, that’s kind of like saying here.. lets bend over and see who gets it first right? wow.. really hope the fix was last week.. RIGHT.. pfft.. however.. if not.. then when? HELLO TEN? WHAT HAPPENED TO NINE.. I mean Z .. I keep waiting for the pink hat to show up.. you know the red one that disappeared a few years ago? And then like magic a whole bunch of others appeared? idk.. I don’t really care so much any more.. however, for the safety of the children , cough cough..
arg2you
#everyone
#tech
#microsoft
#redhat
#dogpile
#ibm
#apple
#linux
# all those other strange named companies that have made massive amounts of money off of me and the other silly people whom so love the services.. oh wait.. that’s like everyone now right?
…unless you live in that long lost tribe down the amazon where they have never seen a lighter.. until last year.
Peter Lunn says
Thanks Alan Stainer. Another fail by Microsoft. Why should it take them 92 days to fix last week’s bug reveal? Possibly it took them just 2 days after Google made it public and MS were ignoring it. Then to do the same again! It will be interesting to see how long the next fix takes. Cannot help thinking though that Google are up to some negative PR to benefit themselves. Perhaps a kick back against Microsoft’s Scroogled campaign a while back?
Peter Lunn says
Thanks Alan Stainer. Another fail by Microsoft. Why should it take them 92 days to fix last week’s bug reveal? Possibly it took them just 2 days after Google made it public and MS were ignoring it. Then to do the same again! It will be interesting to see how long the next fix takes. Cannot help thinking though that Google are up to some negative PR to benefit themselves. Perhaps a kick back against Microsoft’s Scroogled campaign a while back?
Peter Lunn says
Thanks Alan Stainer. Another fail by Microsoft. Why should it take them 92 days to fix last week’s bug reveal? Possibly it took them just 2 days after Google made it public and MS were ignoring it. Then to do the same again! It will be interesting to see how long the next fix takes. Cannot help thinking though that Google are up to some negative PR to benefit themselves. Perhaps a kick back against Microsoft’s Scroogled campaign a while back?
Peter Lunn says
Thanks Alan Stainer. Another fail by Microsoft. Why should it take them 92 days to fix last week’s bug reveal? Possibly it took them just 2 days after Google made it public and MS were ignoring it. Then to do the same again! It will be interesting to see how long the next fix takes. Cannot help thinking though that Google are up to some negative PR to benefit themselves. Perhaps a kick back against Microsoft’s Scroogled campaign a while back?
Alan Stainer says
I don’t know about a kick back. It feels to me like a standard procedure they use on everyone. The fact that Microsoft have slipped up is entirely on them.
When it comes to negative PR (deliberate or not) at least Google have actually found a real cause for concern, whereas the Scroogled campaign (may it rest in pieces) was never about accuracy, while also being hypocritical.
Alan Stainer says
I don’t know about a kick back. It feels to me like a standard procedure they use on everyone. The fact that Microsoft have slipped up is entirely on them.
When it comes to negative PR (deliberate or not) at least Google have actually found a real cause for concern, whereas the Scroogled campaign (may it rest in pieces) was never about accuracy, while also being hypocritical.
Alan Stainer says
I don’t know about a kick back. It feels to me like a standard procedure they use on everyone. The fact that Microsoft have slipped up is entirely on them.
When it comes to negative PR (deliberate or not) at least Google have actually found a real cause for concern, whereas the Scroogled campaign (may it rest in pieces) was never about accuracy, while also being hypocritical.
Alan Stainer says
I don’t know about a kick back. It feels to me like a standard procedure they use on everyone. The fact that Microsoft have slipped up is entirely on them.
When it comes to negative PR (deliberate or not) at least Google have actually found a real cause for concern, whereas the Scroogled campaign (may it rest in pieces) was never about accuracy, while also being hypocritical.
Mat Bennett says
“We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal.”
Exactly. That is why sticking to the stated 90 days and creating a culture focused on patching in that timescale is so important.
Mat Bennett says
“We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal.”
Exactly. That is why sticking to the stated 90 days and creating a culture focused on patching in that timescale is so important.
Mat Bennett says
“We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal.”
Exactly. That is why sticking to the stated 90 days and creating a culture focused on patching in that timescale is so important.
Mat Bennett says
“We urge Google to make protection of customers our collective primary goal.”
Exactly. That is why sticking to the stated 90 days and creating a culture focused on patching in that timescale is so important.