UK to ‘scale down’ climate change and illegal wildlife measures to bring in post-Brexit trade, secret documents reveal
If this is true, then it sickens me. We really need a general election in the UK and we need it now.
Alan Stainer
Tech head through and through.
It’s unlikely that there will ever be a time that ‘eviormental/population <' will ever trump financial concerns in any future 'moment' of time.
It’s unlikely that there will ever be a time that ‘eviormental/population <' will ever trump financial concerns in any future 'moment' of time.
It’s unlikely that there will ever be a time that ‘eviormental/population <' will ever trump financial concerns in any future 'moment' of time.
Of course it’s not true Alan Stainer, or should I say, of course it’s “probably not true”!
As in “if true” and “if genuine” and ”civil service documents have reportedly revealed.”
A few words that, linked to phrases such as: “Critics of Brexit and the Conservatives said they were concerned that the UK Government is planning to use its sweeping powers to determine which of the thousands of EU acts will be repealed and which will be maintained under UK law.”
And: ”Gina Miller, the woman who won her case at the Supreme Court and forced Ms May to consult Parliament before triggering Article 50, has threatened further legal action if the Government does take advantage of the so-called Henry VIII clause to make those changes.”
Can be concocted into a media story by a paper that has, (”if true”) an 86% non-Conservative following, with an unproven and wholly ambiguous: ”The documents were contained in a folder belonging to a senior civil servant at the Department for International Trade, and were photographed by a passenger on a train.” (oh really, that again) and you basically have a complete load of cobblers.
…unless someone is able to reveal those photographed papers that specifically state:
”The UK Government plans to water down regulations surrounding climate change and illegal wildlife trading in an effort to help secure post-Brexit trade…”
Until then, specifically: ”The Government promised in its manifesto and in the recent Great Repeal Bill White Paper to leave the environment in a better state for future generations,”
”If true” of course!
Of course it’s not true Alan Stainer, or should I say, of course it’s “probably not true”!
As in “if true” and “if genuine” and ”civil service documents have reportedly revealed.”
A few words that, linked to phrases such as: “Critics of Brexit and the Conservatives said they were concerned that the UK Government is planning to use its sweeping powers to determine which of the thousands of EU acts will be repealed and which will be maintained under UK law.”
And: ”Gina Miller, the woman who won her case at the Supreme Court and forced Ms May to consult Parliament before triggering Article 50, has threatened further legal action if the Government does take advantage of the so-called Henry VIII clause to make those changes.”
Can be concocted into a media story by a paper that has, (”if true”) an 86% non-Conservative following, with an unproven and wholly ambiguous: ”The documents were contained in a folder belonging to a senior civil servant at the Department for International Trade, and were photographed by a passenger on a train.” (oh really, that again) and you basically have a complete load of cobblers.
…unless someone is able to reveal those photographed papers that specifically state:
”The UK Government plans to water down regulations surrounding climate change and illegal wildlife trading in an effort to help secure post-Brexit trade…”
Until then, specifically: ”The Government promised in its manifesto and in the recent Great Repeal Bill White Paper to leave the environment in a better state for future generations,”
”If true” of course!
Of course it’s not true Alan Stainer, or should I say, of course it’s “probably not true”!
As in “if true” and “if genuine” and ”civil service documents have reportedly revealed.”
A few words that, linked to phrases such as: “Critics of Brexit and the Conservatives said they were concerned that the UK Government is planning to use its sweeping powers to determine which of the thousands of EU acts will be repealed and which will be maintained under UK law.”
And: ”Gina Miller, the woman who won her case at the Supreme Court and forced Ms May to consult Parliament before triggering Article 50, has threatened further legal action if the Government does take advantage of the so-called Henry VIII clause to make those changes.”
Can be concocted into a media story by a paper that has, (”if true”) an 86% non-Conservative following, with an unproven and wholly ambiguous: ”The documents were contained in a folder belonging to a senior civil servant at the Department for International Trade, and were photographed by a passenger on a train.” (oh really, that again) and you basically have a complete load of cobblers.
…unless someone is able to reveal those photographed papers that specifically state:
”The UK Government plans to water down regulations surrounding climate change and illegal wildlife trading in an effort to help secure post-Brexit trade…”
Until then, specifically: ”The Government promised in its manifesto and in the recent Great Repeal Bill White Paper to leave the environment in a better state for future generations,”
”If true” of course!
UK is American colony. When Washington farts, London shits itself. Disgusting slaves.
UK is American colony. When Washington farts, London shits itself. Disgusting slaves.
UK is American colony. When Washington farts, London shits itself. Disgusting slaves.
Scale down , Does this mean they will let the market run it’s course!
Scale down , Does this mean they will let the market run it’s course!
Scale down , Does this mean they will let the market run it’s course!
Was there ever any doubt the Tories would attack environmental policy the very first opportunity they got?
Was there ever any doubt the Tories would attack environmental policy the very first opportunity they got?
Was there ever any doubt the Tories would attack environmental policy the very first opportunity they got?
Yes sickening. Were it to happen, the government would have a fight on their hands. Be sure of that. And I’m not sure it is a fight they would want.
Yes sickening. Were it to happen, the government would have a fight on their hands. Be sure of that. And I’m not sure it is a fight they would want.
Yes sickening. Were it to happen, the government would have a fight on their hands. Be sure of that. And I’m not sure it is a fight they would want.
WONT MATTER WW111 THE ROAD TO WAR 5 /10 YRS AWAY
WONT MATTER WW111 THE ROAD TO WAR 5 /10 YRS AWAY
WONT MATTER WW111 THE ROAD TO WAR 5 /10 YRS AWAY
DOMANI VOGLIONO UCCIDERE u amico a breack coffes..see you http://www.cncpunishment.com/forums/showthread.php . and write you to amnesty.org – Document
DOMANI VOGLIONO UCCIDERE u amico a breack coffes..see you http://www.cncpunishment.com/forums/showthread.php . and write you to amnesty.org – Document
DOMANI VOGLIONO UCCIDERE u amico a breack coffes..see you http://www.cncpunishment.com/forums/showthread.php . and write you to amnesty.org – Document
youtube.com – how to make a paper gun| How To Make a Simple Automatic Paper Gun
youtube.com – how to make a paper gun| How To Make a Simple Automatic Paper Gun
youtube.com – how to make a paper gun| How To Make a Simple Automatic Paper Gun